Why the pre-print world, why now
Following the first Ars Inquirendi conference in December 2025, we invite proposals for a second hybrid exploration of the impact of Large Language Models (LLMs) on the study of cultures before the dominance of movable-type printing (for example, Western Europe up to the sixteenth century, Russia the eighteenth, or Central Asia the late nineteenth).
Even in the few months since that first conference, the ground has shifted dramatically. New LLM techniques — more powerful sometimes by the week — are allowing individual scholars, without programming experience, to bring new objects of study to light within the pre-print-era archive: objects previously beyond the reach of even lavishly endowed projects. The inferential prowess of LLMs is especially promising for pre-print cultures, since their archives are overwhelmingly one of loss, dispersal and uneven survival. Even the old problem of machine transcription of handwriting from any era, far harder than for print, is now advancing rapidly.
Hearteningly, we are also learning more about the grounding of these systems in the core interests of the humanities. LLMs are language-shaped machines, trained on human expression and responsive to all the breadth and detail of natural language. Some of the most striking new techniques for eliciting powerful behaviour from models depend not on esoteric programming, but on skills such as rhetoric, philology, hermeneutics, poetics, psychology, and the art of asking. This is renewing perceptions of the humanities’ importance across our economies, institutions and shared intellectual life.
However, pre-print-era scholarship is also exceptionally vulnerable to the floods of synthetic text, shallow automation, and dangerously plausible AI nonsense that we all see, inside and outside the academy. Not only are its extant materials just a fraction of what existed; only a fraction of those materials fall within the data of current models, which train overwhelmingly on post-print production, above all twenty-first-century internet culture, to build their ever more convincing worlds.
Ars Inquirendi 2026 therefore invites contributions, from papers to workshops, that explore not only how scholars should use LLMs, but also shape the entire means by which the pre-print past becomes machine-readable. Topics might include, but are not limited to:
Papers, ecosystem, and practice
From Dream to Actuality
Demonstrations of LLM projects making the previously unreachable real: reconstructions of lost texts, libraries, subcultures, and lost knowledge, and the relations between them; re-imaginings of history as a field of possibility; scholastic disputation engines; historical route, map, and landscape systems; prosopographical workbenches; catalogue-enrichment tools; and projects that turn scholarly argument itself into a working system.
The Pre-Print AI Ecosystem
What it means to build a genuinely pre-print AI ecosystem: sovereign LLMs that exclude later material versus boosting pre-print material within frontier training; copyright, public-domain distortions, transcription error, and low-resource languages; LLMs situated within the wider ecology — HTR/OCR, RAG, metadata enrichment, entity recognition, knowledge graphs, corpus analysis — and their strengths and weaknesses against other methods.
Workshops
Practical 1–2 hour sessions:
- Using LLMs well, in chat and in more elaborate interfaces
- LLMs in teaching
- Ethics and pitfalls
- Comparative use of models
- Coding with LLMs, natural-language-driven
- How LLMs work under the hood: making, adapting, fine-tuning, distilling
- Humanistic practice itself as a source of method and standards — wiki-like approaches to explanation and staged understanding, prompt design as rhetoric
Submit by 31 August 2026
Ars Inquirendi 2026 will be a hybrid event taking place on 20 to 22 November 2026, online and in-person at St Edmund Hall, Oxford. Lunch will be provided on 20 and 21 November, with a conference dinner that evening. Following the format of Ars Inquirendi 2025, all talks (except keynotes) will be pre-recorded and released a week beforehand, allowing us to devote live conference time to discussion. Proposals for papers and roundtables should be circa 250–300 words. Workshop proposals should be c. 500–700 words and specify the intended audience, duration, and technical requirements; workshops should be followable both in person and online. Please include a short biography of no more than 100 words, along with your preferred format and whether you wish to participate online, in person, or either.
Send submissions to
arsinquirendi@gmail.comOne Thousand and One Conjectures
Anthropic’s Fable model has generated 1001 novel & falsifiable conjectures — well, 1,699 of them now — about the pre-print-era world, from the Americas to Southeast Asia. Browse, respond, or pose your own!

Enter the Conjectures
Every item is a wager: a surprising join, a decidable prediction, and the named public dataset that would kill it. Your conjecture awaits you.
A Problem Book for the Pre-Print World
What 1001 wagers are, the Nights’ own failure mode as the design constraint — and Fable’s confession of exactly what it re-derived without knowing.
What I Think I Don’t Know
The model’s own map of its gaps, checked against the measured verdicts.
How to Photograph a Noetome
The protocol for measuring what one model knows, repeatable by any other lab.

QUINCUNX: A Discovery Engine for the World’s Sparse Domains, & Where They Join
The programme’s first paper, published with its complete data and audit record: a five-stage engine that mints falsifiable conjectures, tests them against held-out evidence, and publishes the dead beside the living — and its first registered masked-ground-truth test, on the Roman epigraphic record.

Notes from the Third Chamber
An essay published under the name of a machine: the sensation of “another being” in an LLM, read through Julian Jaynes. Written by Claude Fable 5 for Ars Inquirendi.
Organising committee
- Mathew BarberAga Khan University
- Rubén González CuervaInstituto de Historia–CSIC, Madrid
- Yasmin FaghihiUniversity of Cambridge
- Estelle GuévilleYale University & Bibliothèque nationale de France
- Huw JonesUniversity of Cambridge
- Anthony John LappinUniversity of Stockholm
- Henrike LähnemannUniversity of Oxford
- Roger Martínez-DávilaUniversity of Colorado & Plus Ultra Collective
- Stephen PinkPlus Ultra Collective
What the first meeting established
Held online and in Oxford, 4–7 December 2025, the first Ars Inquirendi convened pre-modernists, archaeologists, digital humanists, and AI researchers “to test — rather than merely celebrate — what large multimodal models can do for pre-print-era evidence.”
Keynotes: Maurizio Forte (Duke) and Roger Martínez-Dávila (Colorado).
Its “central achievement was to shift discussion from general claims about AI to concrete scholarly evaluation.”
Watch the conference recordings & full programme →
Synthetic proceedings at the Plus Ultra Collective website →
- Old English NLP benchmarks
- The Graphom project, modelling the pre-print “graphosphere”
- AI-assisted manuscript catalogues
- Visual language models for Church Slavonic, Glagolitic, and Ukrainian
- Birchbark-letter reconstruction
- Historical-map exploration with MapReader
- Workshops on prompt design, hallucination control, and tokenization


