# r3-b1-40

**Claim (as registered):** The folio/leaf-count field is populated on fewer than 0.5% of records in every complete state -- a stricter, India-only version of a related cross-source ceiling tested elsewhere in the same project (which compares against a non-India comparator source at a looser 1% threshold).

**Proposed mechanism:** The same harvest-method-completeness fact described above (list-page enumeration does not parse an extent/folio-count field), tested here at a tighter, India-only threshold without reference to any external comparator.

**Scope:** Source: NAMAMI (India), a state-facetted manuscript-holdings portal (holdings, not origin -- every record is held-by, not produced-by, the state). Training: 11 states with a complete portal walk (~4.22M records: Bihar, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal). Holdout: 9 more states/union territories walked to completion after this claim was fixed (Jammu & Kashmir, Assam, Haryana, Delhi, Manipur, Puducherry, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Jharkhand), each landed as a complete, reconciled count before testing. All data comes from one portal, so survival across states shows stability within this portal's own cataloguing practice, not independently of it.

**Training-side evidence:** All 11 complete states show EXACTLY 0% populated. The small fraction of records nationwide that DO carry this field (about 0.27% of all NAMAMI records at the time) is 100% concentrated outside these 11 states.

**Holdout test and outcome:** Tested (with the same detail-enrichment-pilot exclusion filter described above) across all nine India holdout states/UTs; stayed under the 0.5% ceiling throughout.

**Status:** Survived every tested holdout state.
