# r3-b1-27

**Claim (as registered):** A fourth, rarest routing-instrument pathway -- a non-South-Asian script (Southeast Asian, Sinitic, Inner Asian, Tibetan, or Zoroastrian) overriding an otherwise South-Asian-facet language token -- never accounts for 0.1% or more of a complete state's records.

**Proposed mechanism:** Included for systematic completeness across the routing instrument's full set of decision pathways, rather than because this specific pathway was expected to be a risky or informative test; it is by far the lowest-volume of the six pathways in the training data.

**Scope:** Source: NAMAMI (India), a state-facetted manuscript-holdings portal (holdings, not origin -- every record is held-by, not produced-by, the state). Training: 11 states with a complete portal walk (~4.22M records: Bihar, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal). Holdout: 9 more states/union territories walked to completion after this claim was fixed (Jammu & Kashmir, Assam, Haryana, Delhi, Manipur, Puducherry, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Jharkhand), each landed as a complete, reconciled count before testing. All data comes from one portal, so survival across states shows stability within this portal's own cataloguing practice, not independently of it.

**Training-side evidence:** Maximum 0.033% (107 records, in the Tibetan-presence state); every other complete state lower, several at exactly 0.

**Holdout test and outcome:** Tested across all nine India holdout states/UTs; every state's share stayed under the 0.1% ceiling.

**Status:** Survived every tested holdout state.
