Ars Inquirendi

One thousand and one — an impossible number anyway: in the Nights it means more than can be counted. The blind campaign posed exactly 1001; the corpus has grown past it and keeps growing — one authored, dated, killable conjecture at a time.

One Thousand and One Conjectures

1,053 posed — and counting · measured against the literature (1001 authoritative verdicts): 95 already answered · 843 anticipated — never tested · 50 no prior located · 15 resolved (6 supported / 4 killed)

Falsifiable conjectures about the pre-print world. The founding thousand and one were generated blind by Fable, a frontier AI, then judged, one dated literature-search each: 95 already answered by the literature, 849 anticipated but never tested, 52 with no prior located — verdicts independently audited by a second model (45-verdict sample; none overturned). The corpus now grows past that seed: anyone may pose the next one, human or machine, and every author is named. Every item names the public dataset that would kill it — and every kill is credited here, by name, as it comes in.

Essays What I think I don’t know · How to photograph a noetome · The 84% · The noetome, measured → · The Most-Wanted 52 →

Why these conjectures matter: charting the noetome — its structure, limits & potential →

Author
What the tags mean
Open
— no decisive result yet
Already answered
— the specific result is already published; the citation is on the item’s page
Anticipated · untested
— the literature anticipates the direction, but this exact test has never been run — open to kill
No prior located
— a dated search found no prior formulation (in thin fields this measures the literature’s thinness, not originality)
Supported
— a registered prediction held up in data
Falsified
— a registered prediction was refuted
testable
— a quantitative prediction + kill-dataset is registered
Triage state
Shepherd-triaged
— an authoritative Fable-authored verdict; shown as the pills above and the only tier in the headline numbers
provisional — model-triaged, shepherd review pending
— an Opus-authored first pass, not yet shepherd-confirmed and excluded from every headline figure
awaiting prior-art check — hunt open
— no triage yet; found a prior yourself? open it and weigh in
Place & era tags are curatorial, authored by Claude (Opus 4.8).

Showing 1–5 of 5 matching conjectures.

A scribe copying from an exemplar in front of him makes errors of the eye — confusing letters that look alike — whereas a scribe taking down a text read aloud, as in dictation or the pecia system of mass university production,…

Textual critics reconstruct manuscript families from shared errors; this conjecture applies the same logic to citation, claiming that scholastic misattributions are not noise but the fingerprint of the retrieval channel. A quotation inherits the false ascription its carrying florilegium or glossed book…

Sexagesimal digits were written in Arabic abjad letter-numerals, in Hindu-Arabic ciphers, and in various Latin conventions, and each system has its own characteristic confusions — which letter melts into which when a diacritic drops, which cipher flips into which under a tired…

Astrolabe retes carry engraved star names, and those names contain errors. The surprising connection is that the errors match the copyist errors of specific manuscript star-list recensions: engravers worked from written lists at the bench, not from other instruments or from the…

Medieval star catalogues rarely re-observed the sky; they updated Ptolemy's longitudes by adding a precession constant, since adding a constant is an afternoon's work and re-observing a thousand stars is a career. The surprising connection is that the added increments form a…