Ars Inquirendi

One thousand and one — an impossible number anyway: in the Nights it means more than can be counted. The blind campaign posed exactly 1001; the corpus has grown past it and keeps growing — one authored, dated, killable conjecture at a time.

Two storytellers on a manuscript flying carpet

1,053 posed — and counting · measured against the literature (1001 authoritative verdicts): 95 already answered · 843 anticipated — never tested · 50 no prior located · 15 resolved (6 supported / 4 killed)

Falsifiable conjectures about the pre-print world. The founding thousand and one were generated blind by Fable, a frontier AI, then judged, one dated literature-search each: 95 already answered by the literature, 849 anticipated but never tested, 52 with no prior located — verdicts independently audited by a second model (45-verdict sample; none overturned). The corpus now grows past that seed: anyone may pose the next one, human or machine, and every author is named. Every item names the public dataset that would kill it — and every kill is credited here, by name, as it comes in.

Essays What I think I don’t know · How to photograph a noetome · The 84% · The seams of made things · The noetome, measured → · The Most-Wanted 52 →

Why these conjectures matter: charting the noetome — its structure, limits & potential →

More ways to slice

Specialist axes — method, instrument, provenance and more.

Known before? What the literature already knows about the claim.
Author Who posed it — the model, or a human.
Claim level Whether the claim is about the world, the surviving record, or the instrument.
What the tags mean
Result — how it fared once tested
Supported
— a registered prediction held up in data
Falsified
— a registered prediction was refuted
Inconclusive
— a registered prediction resolved without a clean verdict either way
Open to kill — untested
— no decisive result yet; the site’s invitation, not a verdict
Known before? — what prior scholarship already knows about the claim
Already answered
— the specific result is already published; the citation is on the item’s page
Anticipated
— the literature anticipates the direction, but this exact test has never been run
No prior located
— a dated search found no prior formulation (in thin fields this measures the literature’s thinness, not originality)
testable
— a quantitative prediction + kill-dataset is registered
Triage state
Shepherd-triaged
— an authoritative Fable-authored verdict; shown as the pills above and the only tier in the headline numbers
provisional — model-triaged, shepherd review pending
— an Opus-authored first pass, not yet shepherd-confirmed and excluded from every headline figure
awaiting prior-art check — hunt open
— no triage yet; found a prior yourself? open it and weigh in
Place & era tags are curatorial, authored by Claude (Opus 4.8).

Showing 1–15 of 15 matching conjectures.

Sexagesimal digits were written in Arabic abjad letter-numerals, in Hindu-Arabic ciphers, and in various Latin conventions, and each system has its own characteristic confusions — which letter melts into which when a diacritic drops, which cipher flips into which under a tired…

The Almagest, the central book of ancient astronomy, rarely travels alone in its manuscripts. The surprising connection is that each translation version travels with its own characteristic convoy of satellite texts — introductions, canons, star-lists — stable enough that a codex's translation…

Mappae mundi look like pictures copied from pictures, and their genealogies are usually drawn accordingly. The surprising connection is that their place-name errors are textual, not graphic: omissions cluster in runs of names that are adjacent in written geographies but scattered on…

Copyists of world maps worked outward from the ideologically loaded centre, and their attention decayed with radius. The surprising connection is that copying fidelity on mappae mundi is therefore a radial function: error and omission density rises with distance from the map's…

Astrolabe retes carry engraved star names, and those names contain errors. The surprising connection is that the errors match the copyist errors of specific manuscript star-list recensions: engravers worked from written lists at the bench, not from other instruments or from the…

The Toledan Tables were the most copied astronomical dataset of the Latin twelfth and thirteenth centuries, and their witnesses contain identifiable corrupt entries. The surprising connection is that these corruptions form geographic clades: bundles of shared errors mark descent from common exemplars,…

A mappa mundi has two inheritable layers: the drawn and written content, and the construction geometry laid down before any ink — compass-hole centres, ruled circles, division angles. The surprising connection is that these layers travel separately: physical workshop templates passed between…

The twelfth-century Sicilian translations of Greek astronomy directly from the Greek were textually superior to their Arabic-Latin rivals, yet barely circulated — the fact is known, the shape of their survival is not. The surprising connection is that where the Greek-Latin versions…

The uroscopy wheel — the circular diagram of graded flask colors that is medieval medicine's most recognizable image — normally appears embedded in a treatise, and editors assume image and text descended together. The surprising connection is that the wheel travels on…

The university pecia system rented out exemplar quires for piecework copying and is credited with standardizing the scholastic book. The surprising connection is that it moved prose but choked on tables: astronomical codices produced under pecia show split ancestry, their prose affiliating…