Ars Inquirendi

One thousand and one — an impossible number anyway: in the Nights it means more than can be counted. The blind campaign posed exactly 1001; the corpus has grown past it and keeps growing — one authored, dated, killable conjecture at a time.

Two storytellers on a manuscript flying carpet

1,107 posed — and counting · measured against the literature (1001 authoritative verdicts): 95 already answered · 843 anticipated — never tested · 50 no prior located · 15 resolved (6 supported / 4 killed)

Falsifiable conjectures about the pre-print world. The founding thousand and one were generated blind by Fable, a frontier AI, then judged, one dated literature-search each: 95 already answered by the literature, 843 anticipated but never tested, 50 with no prior located — verdicts independently audited by a second model (45-verdict sample; none overturned). The corpus now grows past that seed: anyone may pose the next one, human or machine, and every author is named. Every item names the public dataset that would kill it — and every kill is credited here, by name, as it comes in.

Why these conjectures matter: charting the noetome — its structure, limits & potential →

More ways to slice

Specialist axes — method, instrument, provenance and more.

Known before? What the literature already knows about the claim.
Author Who posed it — the model, or a human.
Claim level Whether the claim is about the world, the surviving record, or the instrument.
What the tags mean
Result — how it fared once tested
Supported
— a registered prediction held up in data
Falsified
— a registered prediction was refuted
Inconclusive
— a registered prediction resolved without a clean verdict either way
Open to kill — untested
— no decisive result yet; the site’s invitation, not a verdict
Known before? — what prior scholarship already knows about the claim
Already answered
— the specific result is already published; the citation is on the item’s page
Anticipated
— the literature anticipates the direction, but this exact test has never been run
No prior located
— a dated search found no prior formulation (in thin fields this measures the literature’s thinness, not originality)
testable
— a quantitative prediction + kill-dataset is registered
Triage state
Shepherd-triaged
— an authoritative Fable-authored verdict; shown as the pills above and the only tier in the headline numbers
provisional — model-triaged, shepherd review pending
— an Opus-authored first pass, not yet shepherd-confirmed and excluded from every headline figure
awaiting prior-art check — hunt open
— no triage yet; found a prior yourself? open it and weigh in
Place & era tags are curatorial, authored by Claude (Opus 4.8).

Showing 1–7 of 7 matching conjectures.

Scribes routinely closed their work with self-deprecating apologies — “forgive the faults of the unworthy scribe” — and the naive reading treats these as confessions from careless copyists. The claim inverts that: such formulae are costly quality signals, the mark of a…

A scribe copying from an exemplar in front of him makes errors of the eye — confusing letters that look alike — whereas a scribe taking down a text read aloud, as in dictation or the pecia system of mass university production,…

Radiocarbon dating works because decay happens at a constant rate; the conjecture is that manuscript copying does too. Scribes make errors, and within a single scriptorium — same training, same exemplars, same working conditions — the rate of new errors introduced per…

Information theory meets Homer: the stock formulas of oral epic — the swift-footed heroes and wine-dark seas — are here interpreted as redundancy bits, the padding a noisy channel needs to protect its payload. In transmission over fallible human memory, the hard-to-recover…

Two transmission technologies for Sanskrit ran side by side for centuries: the mnemonic machinery of Vedic recitation — interlocking recitation modes and error-checking permutations built to preserve the Rigveda syllable-perfect — and ordinary manuscript copying, which carried texts like the Mahābhārata. Philologists…

Joins the cognitive psychology of recall to the stemmatics of oral law. The serial-position curve is among psychology's oldest findings: in reproducing a fixed sequence, people hold the beginning and end best and blur the middle. Iceland's law was exactly such a…

Capture-recapture statistics estimate a population's size from the overlap between independent samples — tag fish, resample, count the recaptures. This conjecture treats the great Sanskrit subhashita anthologies — the Subhashitaratnakosha, Saduktikarnamrita, and Sharngadharapaddhati — as quasi-independent samples drawn from a floating ocean…