Ars Inquirendi

AI-generated conjecture · below the evidence/publication boundary

← All conjectures · Pre-Columbian American writing

Count the missing by their overlaps

Status: Anticipated · untested

Status is derived only from the shepherd-authored triage/prediction data above -- community submissions and claims are a separate overlay and can never change it (see the participation panel below).

This is a proposed connection between two domains, generated by a language model. It is not an article and not evidence: it sits below the evidence/publication boundary. A quantitative prediction and a named kill-dataset are attached (when registered) so the claim stays falsifiable rather than merely evocative.

Claim (verbatim)

The Mixtec historical codices — Zouche-Nuttall, Vindobonensis Mexicanus 1, Bodley, Selden, Colombino-Becker — are genealogical registers of named persons from named polities, and they cross-attest one another: the biography of Lord 8 Deer Jaguar Claw runs through several of them independently. Burgoa still saw such books in seventeenth-century Oaxaca and describes their destruction. Cross-attestation makes the survivors a mark-recapture sample of the original library of dynastic registers: the rate at which the same persons recur across independent codices estimates how much genealogical record once existed. Alfonso Caso's posthumous Reyes y reinos de la Mixteca compiled exactly the instrument needed — a biographical dictionary of every named person in the codices, attestation by attestation. If most persons prove to be singletons, the surviving books are a thin skim of a large genealogical literature; if the same cast recurs everywhere, the library was always small. Prediction: in Caso's biographical dictionary, at least 60% of distinct named persons will be attested in exactly one codex, and a Lincoln-Petersen or Chao estimate treating each codex as an independent capture of the dynastic-person population will bound the original population at no less than three times the recorded one — implying, at roughly constant persons per book, an original Mixtec genealogical library of at least fifteen volumes of the surviving class (primary clause: the 60% singleton share; the verdict follows it). Kill: the person-by-person attestation index in Alfonso Caso, Reyes y reinos de la Mixteca (Fondo de Cultura Economica, 1977-79), with Jansen and Perez Jimenez's codex commentaries as identification controls; the computation is a capture-recapture estimate over the index.

Prediction clause (verbatim)

Prediction: in Caso's biographical dictionary, at least 60% of distinct named persons will be attested in exactly one codex, and a Lincoln-Petersen or Chao estimate treating each codex as an independent capture of the dynastic-person population will bound the original population at no less than three times the recorded one — implying, at roughly constant persons per book, an original Mixtec genealogical library of at least fifteen volumes of the surviving class (primary clause: the 60% singleton share; the verdict follows it).

Kill-dataset (verbatim)

Kill: the person-by-person attestation index in Alfonso Caso, Reyes y reinos de la Mixteca (Fondo de Cultura Economica, 1977-79), with Jansen and Perez Jimenez's codex commentaries as identification controls; the computation is a capture-recapture estimate over the index.

Nobody has run this test. The kill-data is named above. If you can run it — or you know the paper that already settles it — claim the kill or submit the prior scholarship. Kills and prior scholarship are credited here, by name, as they come in.

Provenance

Run: Fresh agent generation · model: claude-fable-5

Fresh blind generation by claude-fable-5, 2026-07-16, breadth wave: Sub-Saharan Africa + pre-Columbian Americas, weighted by inferred production and above all by loss; every item grounded in real works, authors, codices, catalogues, and testimonia, including the real evidence of destruction, dispersal, and undecipherability; no fabricated citations.

Novelty / leakage triage

anticipated in the literature — this exact test has never been run

The destruction testimony (Burgoa) and the cross-codex attestation of persons such as Lord 8 Deer are foundations of the field, and Caso built exactly the person-by-person index the test needs; but no singleton-share count or capture-recapture estimate of the original codex population was located — the mark-recapture framing appears unapplied to Mixtec codices.

  • A. Caso, Reyes y reinos de la Mixteca, 2 vols (Fondo de Cultura Economica, 1977-79)
  • M. Jansen & G.A. Perez Jimenez, Encounter with the Plumed Serpent: Drama and Power in the Heart of Mesoamerica (University Press of Colorado, 2007)

Predictions

No prediction registered yet.

Weigh in

No community feedback yet.

New here? Create an account first

Create an account or sign in and your feedback is tied to you — you can track it, get replies, and claim this conjecture so others know you’re working on it. Prefer not to? Just leave your take below as a guest — only the name you type is shown.

Add your take

Posted immediately (spam is removed). Community feedback is never an adjudicated verdict and never changes this conjecture's triage label or status above.