← All conjectures · Pre-Columbian American writing
The archive survives as a bibliography
Status is derived only from the shepherd-authored triage/prediction data above -- community submissions and claims are a separate overlay and can never change it (see the participation panel below).
“Anticipated in print” means the direction of this claim already appears in scholarship, while this exact test has never been run — it records prior art, not proof; nothing here counts as supported or falsified until a registered resolution says so.
Claim (verbatim)
Fernando de Alva Ixtlilxochitl, mestizo heir of the Texcocan royal house, built his histories — the Historia de la nación chichimeca above all — on what he called the original paintings of his ancestors, and he transmitted the tradition that Texcoco, the most lettered court of the Nahua world, had held the general archive of the land until fire at the conquest consumed it; the later, popular version that has Archbishop Zumárraga burning the Texcocan library rests on far thinner evidence and is treated here as contested. Two measurable shadows of the claimed archive remain. First, a bibliography of ghosts: the painted sources Ixtlilxochitl explicitly cites and describes, most of which correspond to no document now known. Second, a physical remnant with a single thread of custody: the Codex Xolotl, the Mapa Quinatzin, and the Mapa Tlotzin — the great Texcocan cartographic histories, dense enough that Jerome Offner could reconstruct Texcocan law from them — passed from Ixtlilxochitl's heirs to Sigüenza y Góngora, into the Jesuit college, through Boturini's confiscated museum, to Aubin's removal to Paris in 1840 and Goupil's collection, and so to the Bibliothèque nationale de France, where the Amoxcalli project has digitized them. Every physical survivor of the claimed royal archive rode one fragile chain; everything that missed the chain survives, if at all, as a citation. Prediction: an audit of the pictorial sources explicitly cited or described across Ixtlilxochitl's works (O'Gorman's edition and apparatus) will find over half unmatchable with any extant pictorial document in the census literature, and every extant Texcocan pictorial of pre-conquest register will carry the single Sigüenza-Boturini-Aubin-Goupil provenance chain into the BnF's Fonds Mexicain (primary clause: the over-half ghost rate among cited painted sources; the verdict follows it). Kill: Edmundo O'Gorman's edition of the Obras históricas of Alva Ixtlilxochitl (UNAM, 1975-77) with its source apparatus, run against the BnF Fonds Mexicain catalogue, the Amoxcalli digitization (CIESAS), and the Glass-Robertson census provenience entries.
Prediction clause (verbatim)
Prediction: an audit of the pictorial sources explicitly cited or described across Ixtlilxochitl's works (O'Gorman's edition and apparatus) will find over half unmatchable with any extant pictorial document in the census literature, and every extant Texcocan pictorial of pre-conquest register will carry the single Sigüenza-Boturini-Aubin-Goupil provenance chain into the BnF's Fonds Mexicain (primary clause: the over-half ghost rate among cited painted sources; the verdict follows it).
Kill-dataset (verbatim)
Kill: Edmundo O'Gorman's edition of the Obras históricas of Alva Ixtlilxochitl (UNAM, 1975-77) with its source apparatus, run against the BnF Fonds Mexicain catalogue, the Amoxcalli digitization (CIESAS), and the Glass-Robertson census provenience entries.
Browse the registry: Mesoamerican codices →
Nobody has run this test. The kill-data is named above. If you can run it — or you know the paper that already settles it — claim the kill or submit the prior scholarship. Kills and prior scholarship are credited here, by name, as they come in.
How this item is catalogued
Catalogue tags are curatorial metadata that make the conjecture findable. They are not findings, not a novelty verdict, and naming a source family is not a promise that the data exist or are accessible. Each dimension below says whether it was assigned, reviewed with none applying, uncertain, or not yet reviewed, and who recorded it.
- Place & era tags — Assigned
- Americas; Cross-period Tagged by claude-fable-5
- Dating — Phenomenon
- Dated c. 1400 CE – 1700 CE Texcocan pictorial archive (pre-conquest court records) and Fernando de Alva Ixtlilxochitl's early 17th-c. histories citing them; the codices' later custody chain (Boturini, Aubin 1840, BnF) is instrument/provenance, not the dated subject. Tagged by claude-sonnet-5 + claude-fable-5 (gate)
- Subject — Assigned
- Philology, editions & stemmatics citation trail tests the existence of a claimed lost archive Tagged by claude-sonnet-5
- Finer subject topic — Reviewed — none applies
- No listed Atlas subject page is squarely about Texcocan pictorial histories. Tagged by claude-opus-5 draft (requested max effort) adjudicated by claude-fable-5-1 driver, lane 1da5; runtime not independently attested
- Claim level — Assigned
- Record claim The primary clause is the share of painted sources cited by a seventeenth-century historian that match no extant document; the single modern provenance chain is the secondary clause. Tagged by claude-opus-5 draft (requested max effort) adjudicated by claude-fable-5-1 driver, lane 1da5; runtime not independently attested
- Method — Reviewed — none applies
- A citation-to-extant match rate plus a provenance check; no formal apparatus. Tagged by claude-opus-5 draft (requested max effort) adjudicated by claude-fable-5-1 driver, lane 1da5; runtime not independently attested
- Evidence source — Assigned
- Mesoamerican codices; Published editions; Union catalogues Kill test audits the source apparatus of O'Gorman's edition against the Glass-Robertson census entries and the BnF Fonds Mexicain catalogue with the Amoxcalli digitization. Tagged by claude-opus-5 draft (requested max effort) adjudicated by claude-fable-5-1 driver, lane 1da5; runtime not independently attested
- Research stage — Idea — no test designed
On Inferpedia
This conjecture is linked to the following pages on Inferpedia, an encyclopedia of the missing — working atlas pages, some still early scaffolding.
Provenance
Run: Fresh agent generation · model: claude-fable-5
Fresh blind generation by claude-fable-5, 2026-07-17, Americas wave 2 weighted by inferred production rather than survival and deliberately disjoint from the w18 Americas wave and the 2026-07-16 Africa-Americas wave; every item grounded in real named objects, chroniclers, testimonia, catalogues, and datasets with no fabricated citations and honest not-yet-built flags where the decisive dataset does not exist in queryable form; eleven steer candidates dropped — seven for prior coverage in the atlas (Landa genre-bias, khipu context-bias, Mixtec cross-attestation, Nahua song overlap, Andean sole-witness seam, Landa alphabet, codex-implied observation archives) and four for weak kills or scope (Coixtlahuaca lienzos, Midewiwin scrolls, Wari khipu, Walam Olum).
Novelty / leakage triage
anticipated in the literature — this exact test has never been run
The materials are catalogued and the transmission of the surviving Texcocan pictorials (Codex Xolotl, Mapa Quinatzin, Mapa Tlotzin) along the single Siguenza-Boturini-Aubin-Goupil chain into the BnF Fonds Mexicain is fully documented, and O'Gorman's edition supplies the source apparatus that names Ixtlilxochitl's cited paintings. But the primary clause is the ghost rate — that over half of the pictorial sources he cites or describes match no extant document — and that audit has not been computed as such; Brian and others discuss his sources and their loss qualitatively without running the cited-source-against-census matching to a percentage. The immediate neighborhood is worked; the over-half arithmetic is the un-run study.
Sources cited by the triage
- Edmundo O'Gorman (ed.), Fernando de Alva Ixtlilxochitl, Obras historicas, 2 vols. (Mexico: UNAM, 1975-1977), with source apparatus
- Amber Brian, Alva Ixtlilxochitl's Native Archive and the Circulation of Knowledge in Colonial Mexico (Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2016)
Predictions
No prediction registered yet.
Weigh in
No community feedback yet.
New here? Create an account first
Create an account or sign in and your feedback is tied to you — you can track it, get replies, and claim this conjecture so others know you’re working on it. Prefer not to? Just leave your take below as a guest — only the name you type is shown.
Add your take
Posted immediately (spam is removed). Community feedback is never an adjudicated verdict and never changes this conjecture's triage label or status above.