Ars Inquirendi

AI-generated conjecture · below the evidence/publication boundary

← All conjectures · Literature & poetics

The curriculum cliff

Status: Anticipated · untested

Status is derived only from the shepherd-authored triage/prediction data above -- community submissions and claims are a separate overlay and can never change it (see the participation panel below).

This is a proposed connection between two domains, generated by a language model. It is not an article and not evidence: it sits below the evidence/publication boundary. A quantitative prediction and a named kill-dataset are attached (when registered) so the claim stays falsifiable rather than merely evocative.

Claim (verbatim)

The curriculum cliff. Connects the survival statistics of Greek literature to the Byzantine school as a replication machine: a work either entered the curriculum-and-anthology circuit, recopied every generation in every provincial classroom, or it depended on sporadic scholarly interest. Two regimes of reproduction should leave two humps rather than one smooth tail: witness counts are not one rich-get-richer process but a mixture, with a thinly populated gap between works kept alive by scholars (a handful of copies) and works kept alive by the school (scores to hundreds).

Prediction clause (verbatim)

On the distribution of witnesses-per-work across the roughly 21,500 works in Pinakes, primary clause: log witness counts for works with at least 2 witnesses reject unimodality (Hartigan dip test, p < 0.01), with an antimode falling between roughly 10 and 40 witnesses. Secondary: at least two thirds of the works above the antimode are school-circuit texts (Psalter and liturgy, grammar and rhetoric curricula, the tragic and comic triads, canonical church fathers). The verdict follows the primary clause.

Kill-dataset (verbatim)

Kill: the in-house Pinakes Greek works-by-witnesses counts (21.5k works).

Nobody has run this test. The kill-data is named above. If you can run it — or you know the paper that already settles it — claim the kill or submit the prior scholarship. Kills and prior scholarship are credited here, by name, as they come in.

On Inferpedia

This conjecture has been linked to the following subject pages on Inferpedia — an encyclopedia of the missing, now in limited preview.

Provenance

Run: Fresh agent generation · model: claude-fable-5

Generated by a fresh Fable-tier instance (claude-fable-5) at maximum effort with generation-first blindness (no repo reads, no web searches, no DB queries; single packet Write was the only tool use); title list supplied at launch, titles only, no verdicts or dossiers seen (sidecar docs/generated/conjecture_fresh_fable_w01_titlelist_20260708.md); prompt pre-committed in docs/generated/conjectures_1001_wave_ledger.md and docs/generated/conjecture_fresh_fable_w01_prompt_20260708.txt. Wave W01 of docs/GOAL_CONJECTURES_1001_CAMPAIGN_20260708.md. Novelty unverified by construction.

Novelty / leakage triage

anticipated in the literature — this exact test has never been run

The school-canon-as-replication-machine account of Greek survival is standard, and recent quantitative work models witnesses-per-work distributions in this data as a single power-law-like rich-get-richer process; the mixture/bimodality claim (dip test, antimode at 10-40 witnesses) directly departs from that and has not been run.

Predictions

No prediction registered yet.

Weigh in

No community feedback yet.

New here? Create an account first

Create an account or sign in and your feedback is tied to you — you can track it, get replies, and claim this conjecture so others know you’re working on it. Prefer not to? Just leave your take below as a guest — only the name you type is shown.

Add your take

Posted immediately (spam is removed). Community feedback is never an adjudicated verdict and never changes this conjecture's triage label or status above.