AI-generated conjecture · below the evidence/publication boundary
← All conjectures · Philosophy, theology & the schools
Alphabetical piety travels
Status is derived only from the shepherd-authored triage/prediction data above -- community submissions and claims are a separate overlay and can never change it (see the participation panel below).
Claim (verbatim)
After confession became obligatory in 1215, Europe needed reference books for confessors, and two designs competed: systematic summae organized by theological order, and alphabetical ones organized like dictionaries. The conjecture is that alphabet beat system in the survival record by a wide, measurable margin: alphabetical pastoral manuals should show roughly double the surviving copies of systematic rivals of the same period, because a parish confessor under time pressure needs lookup, not architecture, and books that get used get recopied. The friars who wrote these tools were, in effect, running a field trial of information retrieval. If it holds, the alphabetization of moral theology was driven from the confessional queue upward, and copy counts record a user-interface victory.
Prediction clause (verbatim)
Primary clause: the median surviving witness count of alphabetically organized pastoral summae (e.g., the Summa Pisana and its family) is at least twice the median of systematically organized confessors' manuals composed within the same half-century. Secondary: later systematic manuals acquire alphabetical indexes at a rising rate, converging on the winner's interface.
Kill-dataset (verbatim)
Bloomfield's Incipits of Latin Works on the Virtues and Vices witness lists, with Kaeppeli's Scriptores Ordinis Praedicatorum copy counts.
Nobody has run this test. The kill-data is named above. If you can run it — or you know the paper that already settles it — claim the kill or submit the prior scholarship. Kills and prior scholarship are credited here, by name, as they come in.
On Inferpedia
This conjecture has been linked to the following subject pages on Inferpedia — an encyclopedia of the missing, now in limited preview.
Provenance
Run: Fresh agent generation · model: claude-fable-5
This packet was produced in a single blind Write from model-internal knowledge only, with no repository reads, web access, database queries, or any tool call other than this Write.
Novelty / leakage triage
anticipated in the literature — this exact test has never been run
The victory of alphabetical order in confessors' summae is described qualitatively (the Summa Pisana discarding systematic arrangement; Boyle's work on pastoral manuals), but the survival-count comparison — alphabetical works at double the median witnesses of systematic contemporaries — is un-run.
Predictions
No prediction registered yet.
Weigh in
No community feedback yet.
New here? Create an account first
Create an account or sign in and your feedback is tied to you — you can track it, get replies, and claim this conjecture so others know you’re working on it. Prefer not to? Just leave your take below as a guest — only the name you type is shown.
Add your take
Posted immediately (spam is removed). Community feedback is never an adjudicated verdict and never changes this conjecture's triage label or status above.