← All conjectures · Philosophy, theology & the schools
Objections are durable goods
Status is derived only from the shepherd-authored triage/prediction data above -- community submissions and claims are a separate overlay and can never change it (see the participation panel below).
“Anticipated in print” means the direction of this claim already appears in scholarship, while this exact test has never been run — it records prior art, not proof; nothing here counts as supported or falsified until a registered resolution says so.
Claim (verbatim)
A good objection was hard capital: finding an authority who appears to contradict the received position took rare hunting, while supporting quotations lay everywhere, so the dialectical armory was small, curated, and long-lived. This conjecture claims the asymmetry is measurable as differential reuse: quotations deployed in the objection role should recur across more works and more years than quotations deployed in support, because scarcity drives hoarding and masters kept their objection stock the way fencers keep tricks. The join is between the economics of durable versus consumable goods and the internal recycling of a citation corpus. If this holds, medieval scholasticism ran on a distinct, slowly refreshing database of disagreement whose turnover rate we can now measure, and the objection sections of different works become witnesses to one shared notebook.
Prediction clause (verbatim)
Primary clause (verdict follows it): in the Aquinas citation corpus, the distribution of cross-work reuse counts for authority-passages whose modal structural role is objection has a significantly heavier tail than for passages whose modal role is corpus-support, controlling for the passage's total frequency. Secondary clause: the median time span between first and last use is longer for objection-role passages. Statistical test.
Kill-dataset (verbatim)
The Aquinas citation corpus passage-level reuse across works, with structural-position coding.
In the kill-dataset registry:
Nobody has run this test. The kill-data is named above. If you can run it — or you know the paper that already settles it — claim the kill or submit the prior scholarship. Kills and prior scholarship are credited here, by name, as they come in.
On Inferpedia
This conjecture is linked to the following pages on Inferpedia, an encyclopedia of the missing — working atlas pages, some still early scaffolding.
Provenance
Run: Fresh agent generation · model: claude-fable-5
Generated blind by claude-fable-5 in a single Write with no file reads, web access, or database queries; all context was supplied inline in the launching prompt.
Novelty / leakage triage
anticipated in the literature — this exact test has never been run
The existence of curated, long-lived stocks of reusable disputational auctoritates is documented — florilegia such as the Manipulus florum and the philosophical auctoritates collections were compiled precisely as durable, recycled quotation armories for argument and preaching. The heavy-tail reuse statistic by structural role is un-run, but the hoarded-stock mechanism is established.
Predictions
No prediction registered yet.
Weigh in
No community feedback yet.
New here? Create an account first
Create an account or sign in and your feedback is tied to you — you can track it, get replies, and claim this conjecture so others know you’re working on it. Prefer not to? Just leave your take below as a guest — only the name you type is shown.
Add your take
Posted immediately (spam is removed). Community feedback is never an adjudicated verdict and never changes this conjecture's triage label or status above.