← All conjectures · The oral-written interface
All Roads Lead to Socrates
Known defect — found by this project’s own review and published rather than repaired: Triage found an attribution slip in the claim's background chain: the Bocados de Oro translates al-Mubashshir ibn Fātik, not Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq; the pinned three-stage census is unaffected. Read the full triage rationale ↓
Status is derived only from the shepherd-authored triage/prediction data above -- community submissions and claims are a separate overlay and can never change it (see the participation panel below).
“Anticipated in print” means the direction of this claim already appears in scholarship, while this exact test has never been run — it records prior art, not proof; nothing here counts as supported or falsified until a registered resolution says so.
Claim (verbatim)
Wisdom literature travels as cargo whose labels rub off: at each translation hop, floating sayings re-attach to the biggest names the new audience knows. The chain from the Greek gnomologia through Hunayn ibn Ishaq's 9th-century Arabic collection into the Castilian Bocados de Oro (c. 1250) and on to the English Dicts or Sayings of the Philosophers (printed by Caxton, 1477) should therefore show attribution entropy falling monotonically: the share of sayings assigned to the top three sages (Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle chief among them) grows with every hop across six centuries, as minor Greek names are absorbed by the giants.
Prediction clause (verbatim)
Prediction: the top-three-sage share of attributed sayings increases monotonically across the three countable stages - Gnomologium Vaticanum (Greek), Bocados de Oro (Castilian), Caxton's Dictes (English) - and the terminal share is at least 1.8x the initial share, with the increase holding for Socrates alone as well; coverage guard: at least 250 discretely attributed sayings counted per stage, else inconclusive.
Kill-dataset (verbatim)
Kill: Sternbach's edition of the Gnomologium Vaticanum (Wiener Studien 9-11, 1887-1889), Knust's Bocados de Oro (Mittheilungen aus dem Eskurial, 1879), and the 1877 facsimile of Caxton's 1477 Dictes and Sayings of the Philosophers, all on archive.org - count attribution headings per sage at each stage.
Nobody has run this test. The kill-data is named above. If you can run it — or you know the paper that already settles it — claim the kill or submit the prior scholarship. Kills and prior scholarship are credited here, by name, as they come in.
On Inferpedia
This conjecture is linked to the following pages on Inferpedia, an encyclopedia of the missing — working atlas pages, some still early scaffolding.
Provenance
Run: Fresh agent generation · model: claude-fable-5
Fresh blind generation by claude-fable-5, 2026-07-20, for the connected-Old-World (movement-signatures) wave. The sixteen items lean on digit-string error phylogeny, first-translation-lag profiles (backlog cliffs and two-pulse corridors), bridge-language fingerprints (Sogdian, Aramaic-chancery, Judeo-Arabic), attribution drift, and pulse/directional asymmetries, with five anti-connection wagers (ordinals 2, 9, 13, 14, 15) where independence or non-transmission is the predicted outcome.
Novelty / leakage triage
anticipated in the literature — this exact test has never been run
Attribution drift onto the biggest names is an established phenomenon of gnomological scholarship, and the Greek-Arabic-Castilian-French-English chain behind Caxton's Dictes is well studied. The claim contains a factual error: Bocados de Oro is the Castilian rendering of al-Mubashshir ibn Fatik's Mukhtar al-hikam wa-mahasin al-kalim (1048-49), not of Hunayn ibn Ishaq's collection; Hunayn's gnomologium fed the separate Castilian Libro de los buenos proverbios. A second looseness: the Gnomologium Vaticanum is a comparandum for the Greek state of the tradition, not a lineal ancestor of the Arabic stage, so stage one of the pinned series measures a cousin rather than a parent, which the resolution should state. The pinned monotone top-three-share census across the three named editions has not, to my knowledge, been run; the drift mechanism is widely asserted but rarely quantified. Adjacent, with the source-attribution error flagged as data.
Sources cited by the triage
- Dimitri Gutas, Greek Wisdom Literature in Arabic Translation: A Study of the Graeco-Arabic Gnomologia, American Oriental Society, 1975.
- ‘Abd al-Rahman Badawi (ed.), Mukhtar al-hikam wa-mahasin al-kalim of al-Mubashshir ibn Fatik, Instituto Egipcio de Estudios Islamicos, Madrid, 1958. — The actual Arabic source of Bocados de Oro.
- Hermann Knust, Mittheilungen aus dem Eskurial, Bibliothek des Litterarischen Vereins in Stuttgart 141, 1879. — The Bocados edition pinned in the packet.
- Curt F. Buhler (ed.), The Dicts and Sayings of the Philosophers, Early English Text Society o.s. 211, 1941. — The English terminus and its French and Latin ancestry.
Predictions
No prediction registered yet.
Weigh in
No community feedback yet.
New here? Create an account first
Create an account or sign in and your feedback is tied to you — you can track it, get replies, and claim this conjecture so others know you’re working on it. Prefer not to? Just leave your take below as a guest — only the name you type is shown.
Add your take
Posted immediately (spam is removed). Community feedback is never an adjudicated verdict and never changes this conjecture's triage label or status above.