Resolution: Inconclusive
Caveats: INCONCLUSIVE BY DESIGN -- registered clause 1, evaluated first precisely for this scenario. The held Fihrist sample contains ZERO Nizami manuscripts securely dated before 1349 CE (the earliest is MS. Ouseley 274/275, 1365-66 CE), against the 8 the criteria require to even run the pre-1349-vs-9th-c-AH contrast. So the claim is NEITHER falsified NOR supported: it is simply untestable against in-house data as it stands. This empty window is a collection-history artifact, not evidence about the manuscript tradition itself -- Fihrist catalogues predominantly UK institutional holdings (Bodleian, BL, Cambridge, RAS), whereas the early 13th-14th-c. Khamsa copies documented in the wider scholarly literature sit disproportionately in Iranian, Turkish and Central Asian collections (Topkapi Sarayi, the National Library of Iran, the Suleymaniye, IOM St Petersburg) that this corpus does not hold. The thin-pre-1349 risk was flagged in the registration's own known_priors_disclosure, and the guard fired not narrowly but at zero. NON-verdict-bearing aside (reported for interest, plays no part in the verdict): ignoring dates entirely, the whole 163-manuscript population shows PARTIAL (91) outnumbering COMPLETE (57), ~1.6:1 -- the direction the conjecture predicts, but well short of the staked 3:1 and not the pre/post contrast actually claimed. What would change this verdict: >=8 securely-dated pre-1349 Nizami-attributed manuscripts entering the corpus from those non-UK collections. Full compute log and independent-verification script in docs/generated/instrument_builds/khamsa/.
Registered against the in-house Fihrist ContainedText × ManuscriptRecord layer (triage: adjacent; the separate composition of Nizami's five poems is documented, e.g. de Blois, but the codicological-stratification test was not located). Claim under test, per the conjecture's own registered prediction: the Khamsa is a bibliographic afterlife, not an authorial architecture — among manuscripts securely datable before 750 AH, copies containing only one or two of the five poems outnumber complete-quintet codices by at least 3:1, while among 9th-century-AH copies complete quintets predominate.
Resolution criteria: POPULATION: distinct ManuscriptRecord rows (Fihrist / catalogue source) carrying >=1 ContainedText attributed to NIZAMI GANJAVI THE POET. Homonym exclusion fixed here at registration (spotted at coverage time): EXCLUDE Taj al-din Hasan Nizami (the Taj al-Ma'athir historian, d. 1217) and his work — the poet is identified by author_authority_key resolving to Nizami Ganjavi (c. 1140-1202/03) where present, else by author string containing 'Ganjav'/'گنجو' OR a ContainedText title in the KHAMSA POEM SET, AND never solely by a 'Taj al-Ma'athir'/'Hasan Nizami' attribution. KHAMSA POEM SET (5 poems, each mapped from its title/normalized_title/title_variants): (1) Makhzan al-asrar; (2) Khusraw u Shirin / Khosrow o Shirin; (3) Layla u Majnun / Layli u Majnun; (4) Haft Paykar / Bahram-nama; (5) Iskandarnama (its two parts Sharafnama + Iqbalnama each count toward poem 5). A ContainedText whose title is 'Khamsa'/'Khamsah'/'Panj Ganj'/'five poems' = a COMPLETE quintet entry. PER-MANUSCRIPT CLASS: a manuscript is COMPLETE if it carries a quintet-title entry OR its union of individual-poem memberships covers all 5; PARTIAL if the union covers 1-2 poems; MIDDLE if 3-4 (reported, not verdict-bearing). DATE: from ManuscriptRecord date fields; a manuscript is DATED iff it has a securely parseable production date (ranges accepted; use the range end). Hijri cutoffs converted to CE: '750 AH' = 1349 CE; '9th century AH' = 1398-1495 CE. Windows: PRE = securely datable strictly before 1349 CE; NINTH_AH = 1398-1495 CE inclusive. CLAUSE PRECEDENCE, evaluated strictly in order: (1) INCONCLUSIVE BY DESIGN if fewer than 8 dated manuscripts fall in the PRE window (date coverage too thin to test the primary claim — flagged as a live risk at registration). (2) KILLED if, in the PRE window, complete-quintet manuscripts already equal or outnumber partial ones (partial:complete ratio <= 1.0) — the opposite of the prediction. (3) SUPPORTED if the PRE-window partial:complete ratio is >= 3.0 AND in the NINTH_AH window complete manuscripts are >= partial manuscripts (complete predominates late). (4) otherwise INCONCLUSIVE. Narrative (non-binding): the full partial/middle/complete counts per window; and the secondary ordering test — among the 10 earliest quintet codices by date, whether >=2 distinct orderings of the 5 poems appear in their ContainedText.sequence.
Known priors disclosure: Seen at registration: the shepherd triage (adjacent) records that the separate composition of Nizami's five poems across three decades for different patrons, and the Khamsa as a later assembled package, are documented (de Blois, Persian Literature vol. V); the specific codicological stratification test (pre-750 AH partial:complete >= 3:1; complete predominating by the 9th c AH; >=2 orderings among the earliest quintets) was not located. Data SHAPE confirmed at the coverage check (NOT the verdict): ~257 ContainedText rows attributable to Nizami-ish authors, the five Khamsa poems are identifiable by title, a manuscript FK exists, and the Hasan-Nizami homonym is present and must be filtered (now fixed in the criteria above). The partial-vs-complete ratio, the per-window counts, and the date distribution were NOT computed before this registration. Noetic prior honestly held: the general expectation that luxury illustrated quintets are a later codicological phenomenon than single-poem copies is exactly the conjecture's own reasoning; the test is whether OUR held manuscript sample, with its date coverage, actually shows it at the staked 3:1 threshold.
Exactly the registered criteria (packet 029a09f5). Each manuscript classified COMPLETE / PARTIAL(1-2) / MIDDLE(3-4) by the union of the five Khamsa poems it carries; homonyms excluded (Hasan Nizami / Taj al-Ma'athir per registration, plus Amir Khusraw Dihlavi's and Jami's colliding-title imitation Khamsas and the Nizam al-Din / Nizami-i Aruzi pattern-bearers found during construction); windowed by production date (PRE = securely < 1349 CE; NINTH_AH = 1398-1495 CE); then the registered clause precedence applied in order. Compute: docs/generated/instrument_builds/khamsa/khamsa_compute.py (Sonnet). Independently re-derived from scratch by the shepherd via a different method (khamsa_verify_independent.py). computed_at postdates registered_at (rule 6).
Dataset: In-house Fihrist TEI layer (apps.scriptome): 163 ManuscriptRecord rows (CatalogueSource 'fihrist-tei') each carrying >=1 ContainedText attributed to Nizami Ganjavi the poet, crossed with their catalogued production dates. Fihrist is the SOLE catalogue source in the whole corpus holding any Nizami-Ganjavi content (zero hits across the other 40+ loaded sources), so restricting to it, as the registered criteria require, discards no in-house coverage that exists elsewhere -- there is none.
computed 2026-07-16