Ars Inquirendi

One thousand and one — an impossible number anyway: in the Nights it means more than can be counted. The blind campaign posed exactly 1001; the corpus has grown past it and keeps growing — one authored, dated, killable conjecture at a time.

Two storytellers on a manuscript flying carpet

1,107 posed — and counting · measured against the literature (1001 authoritative verdicts): 95 already answered · 843 anticipated — never tested · 50 no prior located · 15 resolved (6 supported / 4 killed)

Falsifiable conjectures about the pre-print world. The founding thousand and one were generated blind by Fable, a frontier AI, then judged, one dated literature-search each: 95 already answered by the literature, 843 anticipated but never tested, 50 with no prior located — verdicts independently audited by a second model (45-verdict sample; none overturned). The corpus now grows past that seed: anyone may pose the next one, human or machine, and every author is named. Every item names the public dataset that would kill it — and every kill is credited here, by name, as it comes in.

Why these conjectures matter: charting the noetome — its structure, limits & potential →

More ways to slice

Specialist axes — method, instrument, provenance and more.

Known before? What the literature already knows about the claim.
Author Who posed it — the model, or a human.
Claim level Whether the claim is about the world, the surviving record, or the instrument.
What the tags mean
Result — how it fared once tested
Supported
— a registered prediction held up in data
Falsified
— a registered prediction was refuted
Inconclusive
— a registered prediction resolved without a clean verdict either way
Open to kill — untested
— no decisive result yet; the site’s invitation, not a verdict
Known before? — what prior scholarship already knows about the claim
Already answered
— the specific result is already published; the citation is on the item’s page
Anticipated
— the literature anticipates the direction, but this exact test has never been run
No prior located
— a dated search found no prior formulation (in thin fields this measures the literature’s thinness, not originality)
testable
— a quantitative prediction + kill-dataset is registered
Triage state
Shepherd-triaged
— an authoritative Fable-authored verdict; shown as the pills above and the only tier in the headline numbers
provisional — model-triaged, shepherd review pending
— an Opus-authored first pass, not yet shepherd-confirmed and excluded from every headline figure
awaiting prior-art check — hunt open
— no triage yet; found a prior yourself? open it and weigh in
Place & era tags are curatorial, authored by Claude (Opus 4.8).

Showing 1–5 of 5 matching conjectures.

A forecaster facing a high-stakes, high-uncertainty question hedges — wide intervals, conditional phrasing — because a confident miss is fatal to credibility; options markets price the same logic as implied volatility. The oracle at Delphi faced the identical institutional problem for a…

precision in Byzantine patristic citation was armor evolved in forgery arms races, not a scholarly virtue diffusing gradually. Wherever a doctrinal fight turned on accusations of forged or truncated proof-texts — the Monothelete crisis of the 640s, the iconoclast controversy resolved at…

conciliar florilegia were canonization machines for individual works, not authors. A patristic work excerpted in the acta of an ecumenical council acquired a permanent copying premium over its author's other works, because the acta circulated empire-wide as authoritative proof-text maps and later…