Ars Inquirendi

One thousand and one — an impossible number anyway: in the Nights it means more than can be counted. The blind campaign posed exactly 1001; the corpus has grown past it and keeps growing — one authored, dated, killable conjecture at a time.

One Thousand and One Conjectures

1,003 posed — and counting · measured against the literature (1001 authoritative verdicts): 95 already answered · 844 anticipated — never tested · 50 no prior located · 12 resolved (6 supported / 3 killed)

Falsifiable conjectures about the pre-print world. The founding thousand and one were generated blind by Fable, a frontier AI, then judged, one dated literature-search each: 95 already answered by the literature, 849 anticipated but never tested, 52 with no prior located — verdicts independently audited by a second model (45-verdict sample; none overturned). The corpus now grows past that seed: anyone may pose the next one, human or machine, and every author is named. Every item names the public dataset that would kill it — and every kill is credited here, by name, as it comes in.

Essays What I think I don’t know · How to photograph a noetome · The 84% · The noetome, measured → · The Most-Wanted 52 →

Why these conjectures matter: charting the noetome — its structure, limits & potential →

Browse the full kill dataset registry →

Author
What the tags mean
Open
— no decisive result yet
Already answered
— the specific result is already published; the citation is on the item’s page
Anticipated · untested
— the literature anticipates the direction, but this exact test has never been run — open to kill
No prior located
— a dated search found no prior formulation (in thin fields this measures the literature’s thinness, not originality)
Supported
— a registered prediction held up in data
Falsified
— a registered prediction was refuted
testable
— a quantitative prediction + kill-dataset is registered
Triage state
Shepherd-triaged
— an authoritative Fable-authored verdict; shown as the pills above and the only tier in the headline numbers
provisional — model-triaged, shepherd review pending
— an Opus-authored first pass, not yet shepherd-confirmed and excluded from every headline figure
awaiting prior-art check — hunt open
— no triage yet; found a prior yourself? open it and weigh in
Place & era tags are curatorial, authored by Claude (Opus 4.8).

Showing 1–20 of 20 matching conjectures.

When binders needed stiffening material they cannibalised old manuscripts, cutting them into the waste fragments now recovered from bindings. The naive model treats this as physical wear-out — books used until they fell apart — which would produce a smooth aging hazard.…

That illustrated books survive preferentially is doctrine; the sharper, unestablished claim is that survival and integrity anticorrelate through the dealer's knife. Every painting is a separable asset, so the hazard of dismemberment grows with painting count, and the market leaves a dose-response…

Palm-leaf manuscripts in most of South Asia decayed within a few centuries, so every old text we have is the survivor of repeated recopying — but the interval of that treadmill has only ever been guessed at, never measured. Scribes, however, sometimes…

Histograms of Sanskrit intellectual activity — authors per century, works per century — show a striking swell between roughly 1400 and 1800, often narrated as an early-modern efflorescence. But authors are dated largely through surviving manuscripts, and manuscripts survive on a decay…

Manuscript populations have age pyramids, like human populations, and the pyramid's shape records the demography of the institution that did the copying. Hindu texts in Nepal were reproduced continuously by household paṇḍits and temple scribes into the nineteenth century, which should give…

Two selection pressures squeezed Sanskrit works from opposite ends of the length scale: very long works cost too much to recopy whole, while very short works were absorbed into anthologies and compilations and lost independent circulation. The surviving population of independently transmitted…

Almost no Ethiopian manuscript physically survives from the Zagwe dynasty (c. 1140-1270), although Geʽez book culture demonstrably continued — the same dynasty built the churches of Lalibela. Two histories could produce that blank: ordinary continuous attrition, which thins every century smoothly, or…

Sahel manuscripts live on paper in termite country, so books survived by being recopied, not by lasting. This conjecture claims the consequence is a sharp physical horizon: almost no codex in the Timbuktu collections physically predates the mid-sixteenth century even where composition…

The surviving record seems to say Ethiopia wrote early and the Sahel wrote late: Ethiopian parchment books survive from the first millennium, Sahel books barely from before 1600. This conjecture claims much of that famous asymmetry is a substrate artifact: parchment in…

Papyrology turned everyday paperwork into demography: from tens of thousands of dated Egyptian documents, it measured how long contracts, receipts, and letters were kept before being discarded, yielding retention curves for ordinary writing. The Dunhuang library cave in western China preserved thousands…