This corpus of 1001 conjectures was generated under an explicit two-variable theory: that a language model's genuinely novel and killable claims concentrate in the "yield belt" where sources are digitized but questions have not yet been operationalized by scholars, while heavily worked…
One Thousand and One Conjectures
One thousand and one — an impossible number anyway: in the Nights it means more than can be counted. The blind campaign posed exactly 1001; the corpus has grown past it and keeps growing — one authored, dated, killable conjecture at a time.
1,003 posed — and counting · measured against the literature (1001 authoritative verdicts): 95 already answered · 844 anticipated — never tested · 50 no prior located · 12 resolved (6 supported / 3 killed)
Falsifiable conjectures about the pre-print world. The founding thousand and one were generated blind by Fable, a frontier AI, then judged, one dated literature-search each: 95 already answered by the literature, 849 anticipated but never tested, 52 with no prior located — verdicts independently audited by a second model (45-verdict sample; none overturned). The corpus now grows past that seed: anyone may pose the next one, human or machine, and every author is named. Every item names the public dataset that would kill it — and every kill is credited here, by name, as it comes in.
Essays What I think I don’t know · How to photograph a noetome · The 84% · The noetome, measured → · The Most-Wanted 52 →
Why these conjectures matter: charting the noetome — its structure, limits & potential →
Filter
Clear all filtersBrowse the full kill dataset registry →
What the tags mean
- Open — no decisive result yet
- Already answered — the specific result is already published; the citation is on the item’s page
- Anticipated · untested — the literature anticipates the direction, but this exact test has never been run — open to kill
- No prior located — a dated search found no prior formulation (in thin fields this measures the literature’s thinness, not originality)
- Supported — a registered prediction held up in data
- Falsified — a registered prediction was refuted
- testable — a quantitative prediction + kill-dataset is registered
- Shepherd-triaged — an authoritative Fable-authored verdict; shown as the pills above and the only tier in the headline numbers
- provisional — model-triaged, shepherd review pending — an Opus-authored first pass, not yet shepherd-confirmed and excluded from every headline figure
- awaiting prior-art check — hunt open — no triage yet; found a prior yourself? open it and weigh in
Showing 1–5 of 5 matching conjectures.
The corpus presents itself as a portrait of the pre-print world, but its true shape may mirror something else entirely: the modern digitization landscape that fed the model. I conjecture that the corpus's per-stratum density and killability track the record counts of…
Conjectures die in different ways: some are falsified by data, some turn out to be textbook knowledge restated, and some cannot be tested at all because no adequate dataset exists to kill them. I conjecture that these failure modes are not randomly…
A generative model posing research conjectures is an instrument, and an instrument's systematic error should be characterizable. I conjecture that this corpus's dominant systematic error — reinvention, the confident restatement of results already standard in a field — rises monotonically with the…
Every quantitative conjecture in this corpus makes two separable bets: a directional bet (which way the effect points) and a magnitude bet (the specific numbers and intervals named in the prediction). I conjecture that the finished corpus will display a characteristic calibration…