the Hebrew translations of Judeo-Arabic philosophy were not diffusion but evacuation across a script frontier. As Arabic competence died out among the Jews of Christian Europe, translation was the only way the tradition could survive there at all, so the two versions'…
One Thousand and One Conjectures
One thousand and one — an impossible number anyway: in the Nights it means more than can be counted. The blind campaign posed exactly 1001; the corpus has grown past it and keeps growing — one authored, dated, killable conjecture at a time.
1,107 posed — and counting · measured against the literature (1001 authoritative verdicts): 95 already answered · 843 anticipated — never tested · 50 no prior located · 15 resolved (6 supported / 4 killed)
Falsifiable conjectures about the pre-print world. The founding thousand and one were generated blind by Fable, a frontier AI, then judged, one dated literature-search each: 95 already answered by the literature, 843 anticipated but never tested, 50 with no prior located — verdicts independently audited by a second model (45-verdict sample; none overturned). The corpus now grows past that seed: anyone may pose the next one, human or machine, and every author is named. Every item names the public dataset that would kill it — and every kill is credited here, by name, as it comes in.
Essays
Why these conjectures matter: charting the noetome — its structure, limits & potential →
Filter
Clear all filtersMore ways to slice
Specialist axes — method, instrument, provenance and more.
What the tags mean
- Supported — a registered prediction held up in data
- Falsified — a registered prediction was refuted
- Inconclusive — a registered prediction resolved without a clean verdict either way
- Open to kill — untested — no decisive result yet; the site’s invitation, not a verdict
- Already answered — the specific result is already published; the citation is on the item’s page
- Anticipated — the literature anticipates the direction, but this exact test has never been run
- No prior located — a dated search found no prior formulation (in thin fields this measures the literature’s thinness, not originality)
- testable — a quantitative prediction + kill-dataset is registered
- Shepherd-triaged — an authoritative Fable-authored verdict; shown as the pills above and the only tier in the headline numbers
- provisional — model-triaged, shepherd review pending — an Opus-authored first pass, not yet shepherd-confirmed and excluded from every headline figure
- awaiting prior-art check — hunt open — no triage yet; found a prior yourself? open it and weigh in
Showing 1–8 of 8 matching conjectures.
in the Guide of the Perplexed, naming is a safety and positioning policy, not a bibliography. Maimonides names authorities who are canonical and safely dead (Aristotle, al-Farabi) while his heaviest structural and textual dependence — the Avicennian analysis of necessary and possible…
on the medieval Talmud, the density of the Tosafist layer on a tractate is a live readout of the same yeshiva demand that drove codex production, so glossing intensity and manuscript survival should be tightly rank-correlated at tractate level. Neither halakhic importance…
A halakhic responsum is a rabbi's answer to a concrete question — often naming the town, the widow, the disputed courtyard. Later law codes and digests harvested these answers. The conjecture is that the harvest selected against particularity: responsa that later authorities…
Nicholas of Lyra, the fourteenth century's most influential Bible commentator, famously cited 'the Hebrews' — above all Rashi. Rashi's own commentary mixes plain-sense explanation (peshat) with homiletic midrash roughly half and half. The conjecture is that Lyra operated a tight one-way filter:…
The Latin Church numbered the Psalms by the Greek reckoning; the Hebrew Bible numbers them differently, one ahead through most of the Psalter (Psalms 10 through 146). The conjecture is that this dual numbering left a diagnostic scar across Latin religious literature:…
Latin scholastic authority traveled chained to manuscript copies, but the Jewish responsa system gave halakhic authority a second transport layer: opinions moved in letters answering distant queries, then were cited from those letters onward. This conjecture joins postal-network epidemiology to authority diffusion,…
The Tosafists laced their Talmud commentary with cross-references between tractates, and this conjecture claims those links follow the yeshiva's teaching calendar rather than the canon's own arrangement: tractates studied in sequence in the school cycle get linked in commentary far more often…