AI-generated conjecture · a wager, not a finding
← All conjectures · East Asian text cultures
Six hundred schools, counted at the door
Status is derived only from the shepherd-authored triage/prediction data above -- community submissions and claims are a separate overlay and can never change it (see the participation panel below).
Claim (verbatim)
The Hanshu Yiwenzhi (漢書藝文志, Hanshu Yiwenzhi) is the oldest systematic book-catalogue in the Chinese tradition - Ban Gu's abridgment of Liu Xin's Qilüe (劉歆 七略), which in turn condensed Liu Xiang's Bielu (劉向 別錄) - and both parent catalogues are themselves lost, so the Yiwenzhi is a survival census whose own frame did not survive. Its closing tally is explicit and countable: 六略三十八種,五百九十六家,萬三千二百六十九卷 - six divisions, thirty-eight categories, 596 authors/schools, 13,269 juan. The loss mechanism is that this is a Han bamboo-and-silk library catalogued before the paper transition and before any medieval canon-forming institution existed; anything not actively recopied through the Wei-Jin upheavals and the material shift to paper simply ceased to exist. So the survival rate of Yiwenzhi-listed titles, measured against any independent full-text corpus, should be catastrophically low - far below the survival rate of works that first appear in the later, paper-era catalogues. Prediction restated: fewer than one in six of the roughly 596 titles survive as substantially complete transmitted texts; the rest are quotation-fragments, Qing reconstructions, or nothing. The catalogue counts the books at the door; almost none of them came back out.
Prediction clause (verbatim)
Prediction: matching the Hanshu Yiwenzhi's roughly 596 listed titles against an independent full-text corpus, fewer than one in six will survive as a substantially complete transmitted text - a whole-survival share below 0.17 - with the remainder surviving only as quotation-fragments, Qing reconstructions, or not at all (primary clause: the <1-in-6 whole-survival rate; the verdict follows it); a title counts as extant only on an independent full-text witness, not a later re-use of its name, and the test voids for coverage if fewer than 500 catalogue entries resolve to a checkable title.
Kill-dataset (verbatim)
Kill: the Chinese Text Project (ctext.org) full text of the Hanshu Yiwenzhi (漢書藝文志) for the catalogue census, cross-matched title by title against ctext's own pre-Tang full-text library and the Siku quanshu union holdings for the survival determination.
Nobody has run this test. The kill-data is named above. If you can run it — or you know the paper that already settles it — claim the kill or submit the prior scholarship. Kills and prior scholarship are credited here, by name, as they come in.
Provenance
Run: Fresh agent generation · model: claude-fable-5
Fresh blind generation by claude-fable-5, 2026-07-17, East Asia instrument-anchored wave against ctext/CBETA/SAT/Kanseki: every kill names a specific open corpus and a countable operation (loss-annotation counts, catalogue-to-survival ratios, cited-title censuses, citation-geometric overlap, attribution-growth), thresholds far from 1 with coverage guards; disjoint from the 2026-07-08 East Asia wave (different works and operations - Suishu/Yiwenzhi/leishu reused only as instruments under new loss-census operations, flagged) and from the 2026-07-16 India wave, which already owns the Kaiyuan lu missing-books register (pivoted here to An Shigao attribution inflation); Samguk Sagi (not the Yusa used elsewhere) and Fuyo wakashu (Kokka Taikan instrument shared with a Man'yoshu item, seam distinct); dropped the Yongle dadian survival-rate candidate as overlapping the prior wave's print-threshold item. Numbers flagged MODERATE where counts vary are kept out of the load-bearing primary clauses.
Novelty / leakage triage
anticipated in the literature — this exact test has never been run
That the great majority of Yiwenzhi-listed works are lost is a commonplace of the field, and per-entry survival status is available in the annotated-catalogue tradition (Yao Zhenzong's 條理/拾補; Gu Shi's 講疏; Yu Jiaxi's transmission-loss framework). But the primary clause is a specific aggregate — a whole-survival share below 0.17 (fewer than one in six of ~596) computed against a fixed full-text corpus — and that fraction is the reader's own sum, not a stated published result. Materials in print, aggregate arithmetic un-run: adjacent by the conservative test. The qualitative answer is near-certain, but the thresholded survival ratio as posed has not been reported.
- 姚振宗 (Yao Zhenzong), 漢書藝文志條理 and 漢書藝文志拾補 (in 二十五史補編)
- 顧實 (Gu Shi), 漢書藝文志講疏 (Shanghai: Commercial Press, 1924)
- 余嘉錫 (Yu Jiaxi), 古書通例 (on the transmission and loss of ancient books)
Predictions
No prediction registered yet.
Weigh in
No community feedback yet.
New here? Create an account first
Create an account or sign in and your feedback is tied to you — you can track it, get replies, and claim this conjecture so others know you’re working on it. Prefer not to? Just leave your take below as a guest — only the name you type is shown.
Add your take
Posted immediately (spam is removed). Community feedback is never an adjudicated verdict and never changes this conjecture's triage label or status above.