Ars Inquirendi

AI-generated conjecture · below the evidence/publication boundary

← All conjectures · Money & economy

Bottomry break-even

Status: Already answered

Status is derived only from the shepherd-authored triage/prediction data above -- community submissions and claims are a separate overlay and can never change it (see the participation panel below).

This is a proposed connection between two domains, generated by a language model. It is not an article and not evidence: it sits below the evidence/publication boundary. A quantitative prediction and a named kill-dataset are attached (when registered) so the claim stays falsifiable rather than merely evocative.

Claim (verbatim)

Bottomry break-even. Joins actuarial insurance pricing to maritime archaeology. A fourth-century BCE Athenian bottomry loan was repaid only if the ship survived the voyage, so the premium over ordinary land-secured interest is a pure risk price: if lenders broke even, the spread directly encodes the probability that a voyage ended on the seabed. The seabed keeps the other ledger — the dated shipwrecks archaeologists have counted and catalogued. These are two completely independent instruments reading the same underlying hazard, one through the money market of the Demosthenic speeches, one through survey archaeology, and if both are read correctly they must agree. The conjecture predicts that the per-voyage total-loss probability implied by attested loan spreads on the long Pontus and Sicily routes — on the order of one voyage in ten — matches the loss rate reconstructed from wreck counts and grain-fleet voyage volumes to within a factor of two, never falling outside that band.

Prediction clause (verbatim)

Attested bottomry premia (12.5-30% per voyage in the Demosthenic corpus) over the land-secured lending benchmark imply a per-voyage total-loss probability of 8-20% on the long routes (Pontus, Sicily); an independent estimate from dated Aegean-route shipwreck counts, survival-corrected and divided by voyage-volume proxies (Athenian grain-import needs of roughly 500-1,000 shiploads per year), will land within a factor of 2 of the loan-implied band, i.e. between 4% and 40%, never outside.

Kill-dataset (verbatim)

Kill: the Strauss/Parker Mediterranean shipwreck database crossed with attested Demosthenic loan terms and standard grain-fleet estimates. Independent loss-rate estimates differing by more than x4 kill it.

In the atlas

This conjecture is bridged, as an L1 lead, onto these Inferpedia subject pages.

Provenance

Run: Fresh agent generation · model: claude-fable-5

Generated by a fresh Fable-tier instance at maximum effort with generation-first blindness (no repo reads, no searches, no DB queries); title list supplied at launch, titles only, no verdicts or dossiers seen; prompt pre-committed in docs/GOAL_CONJECTURES_BATCH2_20260705.md (7e55eb8). Novelty unverified by construction.

Novelty / leakage triage

already answered in the literature

The actuarial reading of bottomry is the established historiographical interpretation — de Ste. Croix's 'marine insurance in the costume of credit', with rates seasonally and route-indexed — which is the conjecture's core. The cross-check against wreck-derived loss rates was not located, and a commonly repeated informal ~3% per-voyage loss figure sits below the conjecture's implied band — a tension any resolution must engage.

Predictions

No prediction registered yet.

Weigh in

No community feedback yet.

Add your take

Posted immediately (spam is removed). Community feedback is never an adjudicated verdict and never changes this conjecture's triage label or status above.

Working on this?

Sign in to claim this conjecture and let others know you're working on it.