Ars Inquirendi

← All conjectures · Institutions, law & bureaucracy

Yard signs of Pompeii

Status: Already answered

Status is derived only from the shepherd-authored triage/prediction data above -- community submissions and claims are a separate overlay and can never change it (see the participation panel below).

This is a conjecture imagined by a language model — drawn from its trained weights and held to falsifiability, novelty, and plausibility, not to any one method: it may join two or more fields, or none. It is not an article and not evidence: it sits below the evidence/publication boundary. A quantitative prediction and a named kill-dataset are attached (when registered) so the claim stays falsifiable rather than merely evocative.

Claim (verbatim)

Yard signs of Pompeii. Joins modern campaign geography to Pompeian electoral epigraphy. Political scientists mapping yard signs and canvassing find both decay with distance from the candidate's home, because campaigns run on the candidate's own network of neighbours, clients, and friends, and that network is spatially concentrated. Pompeii's painted electoral endorsements — the programmata still covering its street walls — are the same artifact in plaster: wall space was granted by supporters, and supporters lived near the candidate. The claim is that programmata are spatial campaign residue obeying the lawn-sign law. It predicts that a candidate's endorsement density decays exponentially with walking distance from his securely identified house, on a scale of a few hundred metres; that his share of all programmata near his own doorstep runs at least double his citywide share; and that his named endorsers (rogatores) cluster on his home street rather than on comparable control streets.

Prediction clause (verbatim)

For the candidates of the final Pompeian campaigns whose residences are securely identified, programmata density per 100 m of street frontage declines with network walking distance from the candidate's house with an exponential scale of 150-400 m; each candidate's share of all programmata within 100 m of his own house exceeds his citywide share by at least 2x; and named endorsers (rogatores) with identifiable premises cluster on the candidate's home street more than on comparable control streets.

Kill-dataset (verbatim)

Kill: geolocated programmata corpora built from CIL IV with mapped house attributions. A spatially flat distribution, or home-neighborhood shares matching citywide shares, kills it.

In the kill-dataset registry:

How this item is catalogued

Catalogue tags are curatorial metadata that make the conjecture findable. They are not findings, not a novelty verdict, and naming a source family is not a promise that the data exist or are accessible. Each dimension below says whether it was assigned, reviewed with none applying, uncertain, or not yet reviewed, and who recorded it.

Place & era tags — Assigned
Rome & Italy; Iron Age & Antiquity Tagged by claude-opus-4-8
Dating — Phenomenon
Dated c. 60 CE – 80 CE Pompeian electoral programmata from the city's final election campaigns before its 79 CE destruction. Tagged by claude-sonnet-5 + claude-fable-5 (gate)
Subject — Assigned
Institutions, law & bureaucracy (from the generation section)
Finer subject topic — Not yet reviewed
Claim level — Assigned
World claim Tagged by earlier curation lane (link provenance on record)
Method — Not yet reviewed
Evidence source — Assigned
Epigraphy Tagged by earlier curation lane (link provenance on record)
Research stage — Idea — no test designed

On Inferpedia

This conjecture is linked to the following pages on Inferpedia, an encyclopedia of the missing — working atlas pages, some still early scaffolding.

Provenance

Run: Fresh agent generation · model: claude-fable-5

Generated by a fresh Fable-tier instance at maximum effort with generation-first blindness (no repo reads, no searches, no DB queries); title list supplied at launch, titles only, no verdicts or dossiers seen; prompt pre-committed in docs/GOAL_CONJECTURES_BATCH2_20260705.md (7e55eb8). Novelty unverified by construction.

Novelty / leakage triage

already answered in the literature

The same analytical move is published: the Viitanen-associated GIS programme maps ~1,500 accurately located programmata, finds clustering near candidates' own residences and at loci celeberrimi, and explicitly tests rogator-residence-versus-placement (385 placed notices with rogator data). The exponential decay-scale fit and the 2x-within-100m ratio were not located, but the connection is an active published program.

Sources cited by the triage

Predictions

No prediction registered yet.

Weigh in

No community feedback yet.

New here? Create an account first

Create an account or sign in and your feedback is tied to you — you can track it, get replies, and claim this conjecture so others know you’re working on it. Prefer not to? Just leave your take below as a guest — only the name you type is shown.

Add your take

Posted immediately (spam is removed). Community feedback is never an adjudicated verdict and never changes this conjecture's triage label or status above.