Nearly everything quantitative about ordinary pre-print writing comes from three preservation flukes — the dry rubbish mounds of Oxyrhynchus, the waterlogged fort at Vindolanda, and the anaerobic clay under Novgorod's streets. These are different climates, centuries, empires, and languages, so if everyday…
One Thousand and One Conjectures
One thousand and one — an impossible number anyway: in the Nights it means more than can be counted. The blind campaign posed exactly 1001; the corpus has grown past it and keeps growing — one authored, dated, killable conjecture at a time.
1,003 posed — and counting · measured against the literature (1001 authoritative verdicts): 95 already answered · 844 anticipated — never tested · 50 no prior located · 12 resolved (6 supported / 3 killed)
Falsifiable conjectures about the pre-print world. The founding thousand and one were generated blind by Fable, a frontier AI, then judged, one dated literature-search each: 95 already answered by the literature, 849 anticipated but never tested, 52 with no prior located — verdicts independently audited by a second model (45-verdict sample; none overturned). The corpus now grows past that seed: anyone may pose the next one, human or machine, and every author is named. Every item names the public dataset that would kill it — and every kill is credited here, by name, as it comes in.
Essays What I think I don’t know · How to photograph a noetome · The 84% · The noetome, measured → · The Most-Wanted 52 →
Why these conjectures matter: charting the noetome — its structure, limits & potential →
Filter
Clear all filtersBrowse the full kill dataset registry →
What the tags mean
- Open — no decisive result yet
- Already answered — the specific result is already published; the citation is on the item’s page
- Anticipated · untested — the literature anticipates the direction, but this exact test has never been run — open to kill
- No prior located — a dated search found no prior formulation (in thin fields this measures the literature’s thinness, not originality)
- Supported — a registered prediction held up in data
- Falsified — a registered prediction was refuted
- testable — a quantitative prediction + kill-dataset is registered
- Shepherd-triaged — an authoritative Fable-authored verdict; shown as the pills above and the only tier in the headline numbers
- provisional — model-triaged, shepherd review pending — an Opus-authored first pass, not yet shepherd-confirmed and excluded from every headline figure
- awaiting prior-art check — hunt open — no triage yet; found a prior yourself? open it and weigh in
Showing 1–5 of 5 matching conjectures.
The earliest Novgorod birch-bark letters read like tokens accompanying a spoken message; the later ones read like self-sufficient documents with greetings, structured requests, and closings. If writing among the townsfolk of Rus' matured from speech-adjunct to autonomous instrument, the corpus should show…
The birch-bark letters are celebrated as the voice of the common Novgorodian, but the excavated trenches sit disproportionately on the compounds of great boyar clans, and letters cluster where archaeologists dug. If the corpus's social texture is a sampling artifact of elite…
Novgorod's birch-bark texts use a distinctive everyday orthography — systematic vowel-letter interchanges that church parchment avoids. If those interchanges were mere incompetence, their density should fall with the writer's evident skill; if they formed a coherent second standard for secular writing, their…
The schoolboy Onfim's doodled exercises are the mascot of medieval childhood, but the real question is institutional: were Novgorod's children taught in household clusters or at a central church school? Excavated exercise sheets carry findspots, and the two regimes predict different spatial…